Garth Brooks’ sexual assault accuser wants him punished for revealing her identity

The tensions between Garth Brooks and his sexual assault accuser are moving forward with a motion to punish him for using her real name.

The drama between the country singer and his former hairdresser began earlier this month when she made rape and harassment allegations against him under a pseudonym.

However, Garth Brooks tried to stop her from filing a complaint under “John Doe” in September. He allegedly retaliated against his accuser by filing an amended complaint using her true identity instead of her fake name, “Jane Roe.”

Garth Brooks was convicted because he acted “out of spite” and intended to harm his accuser

After Brooks filed his amended statement of claim under his accuser’s name, her lawyers fired back at him in a public statement. They called him a “bully” and claimed he had no justification for using their identities instead of pseudonyms in his complaint.

“Garth Brooks just revealed his true self. Out of spite and as punishment, he publicly named her a rape victim. “Without legal justification, Brooks outed them because he believes the laws don’t apply to him,” the legal representatives argued.

“On behalf of our client, we will immediately advocate for maximum sanctions against him,” the letter concludes. The lawyers reiterated their stance in a letter to the judge, calling for harsh punishment for Brooks’ actions.

“While [Garth’s] Since the request to proceed under a pseudonym was still pending, he filed an amended complaint for disclosure purposes only [Jane’s] identity to retaliate, harm her, and subject her to victim shaming and blame,” the letter said In contact read.

The alleged victim is demanding that Brooks and his legal team pay

The request for sanctions continued, with the prosecutor’s lawyers stressing: “This outrageous behavior cannot be toleratedAnd [Garth] and his counsel shall be responsible for the sentences imposed by this court.”

They reiterated their claims about Brooks’ malicious actions, stating: “Mr. Doe revealed Ms. Roe’s identity out of revenge and with the intent to harm Ms. Roe, knowing she would not submit to his threatening behavior,” the lawsuit alleges raised against him.” him, as she had promised all along.

With this in mind, the lawyers asked the judge to seal the legal documents with their client’s full name. “Every hour, let alone every day, that the amended complaint remains in the public record significantly harms Ms. Roe,” her plea states.

Brooks tried to stop the sexual assault lawsuit

Days before Brooks dropped his amended complaint, The Blast I reported that The first documents he filed in September were revealed. He pleaded with the court to stop his accuser from suing him with “false allegations.”

Brooks claimed the woman caused him “emotional distress, including fear and anxiety for himself and his family” by threatening to “unlawfully assassinate” his image “by publicly expressing such repugnant and untrue allegations.”

According to the country singer, his former hairdresser tried to extort money from him by threatening to file sexual harassment lawsuits against him. She allegedly sent him a letter through her lawyer on July 17 outlining her demands.

In the singer’s blackmail claims

Brooks called his accuser a liar and remarked: “[Jane] In the July 17 demand letter, he threatened to “publicly file” an attached draft civil lawsuit against it. [Garth] Repeating the same made up accusations unless [Garth] agreed to the payment [Jane] Millions of dollars not to file the lawsuit.

“The letter referred to various celebrity sexual misconduct lawsuits in which the jury had awarded millions of dollars,” the complaint continues. According to Brooks, the former hairdresser not only threatened him with allegations of sexual assault, but also with allegations of a contract killer.

The accuser allegedly believed the singer was “planning to hire someone to murder her”; However, Brooks emphasized that he had never heard of her assault allegations or the assassination attempt until her demand letter.

Garth Brooks once had a good working relationship with his accuser

Brooks noted that he and his former hairdresser had a good working relationship for years until she moved from Tennessee to Mississippi in May 2020. The woman was allegedly in financial difficulties and he supported her out of loyalty and friendship.

But the situation allegedly turned toxic when the former employee believed she was entitled to more and demanded “paid employment and medical benefits.” When Brooks refused her demands, she “responded with false and outrageous allegations of sexual misconduct that she claims occurred years ago.”

Garth Brooks has vehemently denied the allegations in a public statement and vowed to clear his name. Can he avoid sanction for revealing the name of his accuser before the case goes to trial?