close
close

From Iconic to Terrifying: How Boys Over Flowers and The Heirs Didn’t Age Well

From Iconic to Terrifying: How Boys Over Flowers and The Heirs Didn’t Age Well

Once upon a time, Boys Over Flowers and The Heirs were the It K-dramas that blew fans away. These shows were must-watch dramas and were considered a stepping stone for every K-drama enthusiast. But with the gift of hindsight (and evolved taste), they haven’t exactly stood the test of time.

If anything, they’ve given viewers more reason to shudder than to cheer, and not in the delightful guilty pleasure way either. Let’s take a trip down memory lane and find out why these two dramas feel more like relics of a bygone era than timeless classics.

Boys Over Flowers: The Mess That Started the K-Drama Trend

Ask any long-time K-drama fan and they’ll probably tell you that Boys Over Flowers (BOF) was their gateway drug into the world of Korean television. But that doesn’t mean it was good. In fact, it’s safe to say that BOF has aged like milk.

At its core, BOF is the story of an outsider, Geum Jan-di, and her turbulent relationship with the rich, arrogant Gu Jun-pyo. It’s dramatic plot twists, over-the-top bullying, and an unhealthy amount of schoolyard shenanigans. At first you think you’re dealing with a classic enemies-to-lovers drama where sparks fly. But then it quickly evolves into something far more… problematic.

Let’s talk about Gu Jun-pyo. He might be one of the worst male leads in K-drama history. This guy wasn’t just an idiot; He was a walking factory with a red flag. In the first episode, he’s already driven someone to the brink of suicide, staged school-wide ostracism, and even attacked a group of men on Jan-di in a scenario that could have easily resulted in a physical attack. Oh, and let’s not forget the time he asked Jan Di to lick his shoe – yes, that reminded me of Sandeep Reddy Vanga too.

Now Jan-di was initially introduced as a tough, courageous heroine who would not bow to the rich tyrants. But at some point her character became an absolute doormat. What started as potential quickly disintegrated into her tolerating Gu Jun Pyo’s emotional manipulation and downright cruel behavior. Her romantic scenes? If trembling lips can be described as romantic. The kisses were so stiff and awkward that it was hard to believe anyone had fainted. In short, it was a hot mess. The script lacked logic, the actors seemed forced and the romance? Non-existent. It’s almost a mystery how this show became so iconic.

The Heirs: A Star-Studded Train Wreck

If Boys Over Flowers was a chaotic roller coaster ride, then The Heirs was the overhyped, star-studded but deeply flawed sequel. With its star-studded cast including Lee Min-ho and Park Shin-hye (again), you’d think this drama would have been a surefire hit. And while it boosted ratings, the story itself…well, it left something to be desired.

Let’s break it down. The Heirs gave us the same tired love triangle. A rich, arrogant boy meets a poor, kind-hearted girl. The rich boy has a rival (of course) and triggers the drama. They could predict every twist and turn without even trying. And while “Boys Over Flowers” ​​was edgy, “The Heirs” was just boring.

One of the biggest problems with The Heirs was the chemistry – or lack thereof – between the main cast. Lee Min-ho’s Kim Tan aggressively pursued Park Shin-hye’s Cha Eun-sang, but instead of fireworks, their relationship felt awkward at best.

The emotional depth was non-existent and the love scenes often seemed forced. To make matters worse, Kim Tan already had a fiancée in the story, but he spent more time chasing Eun-sang than actually dealing with his relationship. Just stop it, buddy!

And let’s not forget how the female lead became a pawn in a game between two immature boys. Sure, millions fell in love with Lee Min-ho and Kim Woo-bin because of this drama, but Kim Tan’s character never really developed. He remained the same bossy idiot from start to finish, while Woo-bin’s character, Young Do, was the only one who seemed to have any significant development.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_2EcUcXWQs

What’s fascinating, however, is that despite its bizarre and problematic storylines, “Boys Over Flowers” somehow seems more cohesive in retrospect than “The Heirs.” Sure, it was outrageous, but it never tried to pretend it was something it wasn’t. It tended toward absurdity, for better or worse. Meanwhile, The Heirs felt like it was trying to be both a deep, romantic story and a superficial, sparkling teen drama – and it failed at both ends.

Even comparing the script and acting, “BoF” was more confident in its messy plot, while “The Heirs” often faltered with silly dialogue and underdeveloped character arcs. Fans raved about Kim Tan, but rewatching the film today it’s hard not to cringe at how poorly the plot treats the female characters.

Looking back, both “Boys Over Flowers” ​​and “The Heirs” have not aged well, and for good reason. They may have played a crucial role in bringing K-drama to a wider audience, but that doesn’t mean they were perfect – quite the opposite. The over-the-top elements, problematic male leads, and outdated tropes today leave a lot to be desired.

So if you’re into K-dramas, maybe keep these two as fun, nostalgic footnotes in your journey rather than necessarily watching them. There are many better, more advanced shows waiting for your attention!

Published by:

Trisha Bhattacharya

Published on:

Oct 11, 2024

Related Post