Garth Brooks’ sexual assault accuser reacts to him revealing her name

The accusing woman Garth Brooks sexual assault case has condemned him for publicly revealing her name as he seeks compensatory and punitive damages based on her claims.

Provided in a statement Us weekly On Tuesday, October 8, the accuser’s legal team said Brooks, 62, had “just revealed his true self.” The accuser’s statement came just hours after Brooks filed a complaint alleging that the accuser leaked Brooks’ name to allegedly “blackmail” the singer.

“Garth Brooks just revealed his true self. Out of spite and punishment, he publicly called himself a rape victim,” the statement said Us from Douglas H. Wigdor, Jeanne M. Christensen And Hayley Bakerread. “Without any legal justification, Brooks outed her because he believes the laws don’t apply to him. On behalf of our client, we will immediately request maximum sentences against him.”

Brooks’ complaint filed Tuesday in the District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi Northern Division and received by Usdetailed the country singer’s claims that his name was made public while he waited for a judge to sign his own motion in which he would use a pseudonym for both parties.

Related: The Most Shocking Claims Against Garth Brooks in Sexual Assault Lawsuit

Garth Brooks has been accused of sexual assault and battery and the lawsuit contains some shocking allegations. On Thursday, October 3, it was revealed that Brooks, 62, was named in documents filed by a “Jane Roe.” The lawsuit accused the country superstar of raping a woman who previously worked as a hairdresser and makeup artist […]

Brooks’ John Doe filing states: “When Jane Roe threatened to publish lies about him – with the intent of blackmailing Plaintiff into paying her millions of dollars – Plaintiff filed this lawsuit, to protect his reputation, find out the truth and sue.” an end to their plan. In the interest of his family and also out of respect for Roe’s family, the plaintiff called this lawsuit “John Doe vs. Jane Roe.”

Brooks also claimed in her filing that his accuser gave the court “less than 48 hours after filing her objection before publicly releasing Plaintiff’s identity to the press.” As a result, Brooks’ lawyers said his pseudonym request was “moot” and he would refile his complaint using both names.

Brooks claimed that the allegations made against him by the accuser, a former hairdresser who worked for Brooks in 2019, were “not true.” He also sought an award of “damages” caused by the accuser’s “intentional infliction of emotional distress, defamation and invasion of privacy” as well as “punitive damages sufficient to deter similar future conduct.”

Brooks was named in a complaint on Thursday, Oct. 3, alleging he raped an anonymous woman in 2019 while she worked for him as a hairdresser. (CNN first broke the news.)

Related: Garth Brooks’ Ups and Downs Over the Years: A Timeline

SUZANNE CORDEIRO/AFP via Getty Images Country singer Garth Brooks has experienced ups and downs throughout his career. Brooks rose to fame in 1989 with the release of his self-titled debut album. Since then, he has won two Grammy Awards, 23 Academy of Country Music Awards, two CMT Awards, 10 CMA Awards and many more […]

In the lawsuit obtained by UsThe accuser claimed she began working for Brooks in 2017 after working for his wife. Trisha Yearwood. The accuser alleged that Brooks sent her sexually explicit text messages, repeatedly exposed his genitals in her presence and made “repeated comments” about “having a threesome” with Yearwood, 60.

In the weeks leading up to the Oct. 3 filing, Brooks filed his own complaint, alleging that the accuser had attempted to blackmail and defame him with “false accusations.”

“The defendant’s allegations are not true,” Brooks’ initial filing said. “The defendant, however, recognizes the significant, irreparable harm that such false allegations would cause to the plaintiff’s well-deserved reputation as a decent and caring human being, along with the inevitable harm to his family and the irreparable harm to his career and livelihood.” This is what would happen if she followed through on her threat to “publicly file” her fabricated lawsuit.